Blog

Guide · 8 min read

How to See Saves and Shares on an Instagram Post, and What a Good Save Rate Is

Open your post and tap View Insights: Instagram shows saves and shares as counts, for posts on a public account, for up to two years. It does not show who saved. There is no official good save rate, so divide saves by reach and compare each post with your own median.

TL;DR: To see saves and shares, open the post and tap View Insights (public account needed). Only you see them, and only as counts, not names. Public: likes and comments, though some accounts hide likes. Private to you: reach, saves, shares. Not available: per-slide metrics, according to Meta's developer reference. Track saves and shares per reach, compare against your own median over 10 to 20 posts, and treat outliers as leads to study, not rules.
Own-median comparison means judging each post against the median of your own recent posts for the same metric, usually the last 10 to 20, instead of against an industry average. It controls for audience size and niche, which are the two things benchmarks cannot.

How do you see saves and shares on an Instagram post?

Instagram's Help Center says you can view insights on organic and boosted posts you create, that you need a public personal or professional account, and that post insights stay available for up to two years. The steps it lists: tap your profile, tap the post, then tap View Insights. It names the available insights as Views, Interactions (such as likes, comments, saves and shares) and Profile activity.

  1. Open your profile and tap the post.
  2. Tap View Insights.
  3. Read saves and shares under interactions; write them down, with reach or views, in your log on the same day each time.

The Help Center page lists counts only. We found no documented way to see who saved or shared a post, and no way to see another account's saves or shares. Menus change, so check the page below if your app looks different.

What is a good save rate on Instagram?

No official benchmark exists, and we would not trust a single number. The largest public figures we opened are Socialinsider's report on 21 million posts: a save rate of 0.05% for carousels, 0.04% for Reels and 0.02% for images, but as a share of followers, not of reach. Your own insights give saves per reach, so the two cannot be compared directly. Use the report for the gap between formats, and judge your own posts against your own median of the last 10 to 20 posts of the same format.

Which carousel numbers can you actually get?

Before any formula, sort the numbers by who can see them. Mixing the three groups is the main source of bad analysis, including ours at one point.

NumberWho can see itWhere it comes fromCaveat
LikesAnyone (unless hidden)Public post pageSome accounts hide them. We found 15 of 130 carousel posts with hidden likes.
CommentsAnyonePublic post pageIncludes your own replies and keyword asks.
ReachOwner onlyInstagram insightsUnique accounts that saw the post.
SavesOwner onlyInstagram insightsA count of bookmarks, not of later use.
Shares (sends)Owner onlyInstagram insightsCounts shares, not who they went to.
Per-slide views or swipe-throughNobody, as far as we foundNot documentedMeta's reference says insights are not available for any media within an album.

Meta's developer reference defines reach as the unique accounts that saw the media, and saved as the number of times the media was bookmarked. It lists total_interactions as likes, saves, comments and shares, minus unlikes, unsaves and deleted comments. That last line is a useful reminder that totals include the noise.

The row that matters most is the last. Many carousel guides quote a "12 slides lose 40% of viewers" style curve. We looked for any published slide-by-slide drop-off curve and found none, and the handful of figures we traced did not cite a dataset. If your in-app insights show something per slide, good; the API reference we read does not document it. Nobody outside Instagram has the underlying numbers, so be sceptical of anyone who does.

What should you calculate from your own insights?

Raw counts mislead because they scale with reach. A post seen by 50,000 people will have more saves than one seen by 2,000 even if it is a worse post. Divide by reach.

One caution on benchmarks. Socialinsider's report on 21 million posts expresses rates as a share of followers, not of reach, so its numbers (carousel save rate 0.05%, Reels 0.04%, images 0.02%) are not comparable with a saves-per-reach figure from your own insights. Do not put your number next to theirs. Use their data to see the shape of the gap between formats, not to grade yourself.

What does the public data look like?

With nothing but public numbers you can still learn something. Across 115 carousel posts in our corpus that show likes, the distribution of comments divided by likes is wide and skewed:

Comments per 100 likes across 115 carousel postsPercentiles of comments per 100 likes: 10th 0.0, 25th 0.3, median 3.6, 75th 16.7, 90th 72.7.10th percentile0.025th percentile0.3Median3.675th percentile16.790th percentile72.7

Our own data, October 2026. n = 115 posts with visible likes (15 more hide likes and are excluded). Comments per 100 likes. The top of the range is dominated by comment-keyword posts, which we discuss in the comment-to-DM explainer.

Two things follow. A median post gets about four comments per hundred likes, so any post that ends up near 70 has been doing something different, and the usual something is a keyword ask. And a number like "average engagement" is meaningless across this spread. That is why we compare to the median.

The second public-data lesson is how far a single post can run from the account's typical result. For the 12 accounts that had at least five posts with visible likes, the best post had a median of 7.5 times its own account's median likes. The range was 2.3 times at the quietest account to 285 times at the loudest. One post breaking out is common, and tells you little about the next one. This is why we mark outliers as posts of at least 1.5 times the account median and then check, not assume, what they have in common. In our nine-variable test of design differences, nothing separated those outliers from median posts: see the test.

What is the own-median method, step by step?

  1. Make a log. A spreadsheet is fine. One row per post. Columns: date, format, hook pattern, goal (save, share or comment), reach, likes, comments, saves, shares, followers at posting.
  2. Fix a window. Record numbers at the same age for every post, say seven days. The curve of a post's life is not published, so consistency matters more than the exact number.
  3. Compute three ratios per row. Saves per reach, shares per reach, comments per like.
  4. Take medians. Median of each ratio over the last 10 to 20 posts of the same format. Do not mix carousels with Reels; they behave differently, as the carousel versus Reel numbers show.
  5. Mark outliers. A post at 1.5 times your median or more is a lead. A post at half of it is a signal too.
  6. Change one thing at a time. Write the hook as two variants for the same idea (see the hook patterns) and publish in matching slots. Re-run the medians after ten posts.

This is deliberately boring. It is also what produced the most reliable conclusion in our own research, which was a negative one: when we shuffled the labels of outlier and median posts 5,000 times to test nine design variables, none was significant at p below 0.05. A raw gap that looked meaningful would have been reported as a finding without that test.

Where does the Graph API fit?

If you pull data by API, the Instagram Media Insights reference lists metrics including reach, saved, shares, total_interactions, views, profile_visits and follows, and, for Reels, average watch time and skip rate. It also states that insights data is not available for any media within an album, which means the carousel as a whole is the unit. The practical step is to ask for the metrics you want on the album's media ID and see which return for your media type, because availability differs by type and version. Do not build a dashboard on a metric you have not seen return for a carousel.

The reference also marks some metrics, such as views and total interactions, as in development. Re-check the page before you rely on it, and note the date you did, as we have in the sources below.

What mistakes make measurement misleading?

If you are still deciding how many posts to make so that your medians mean anything, start with how often to post. Ten posts at a steady rhythm will give you more than thirty at random.

Frequently asked questions

Can I see who saved my Instagram post?

Instagram's Help Center page on post insights lists counts of views, interactions (including saves and shares) and profile activity, not the people behind them. We found no documented way to see who saved a post.

Where do I see saves and shares on a post?

On your own post, tap View Insights. You need a public personal or professional account, and post insights are available for up to two years, according to Instagram's Help Center.

Can I see swipe-through rate for a carousel?

We could not find a documented per-slide metric. Meta's Instagram Media Insights reference states that insights data is not available for any media within an Instagram Media album. Check your own in-app insights, because the app may show more than the API does.

What is a good save rate?

We cannot give one. The only large public figures we opened are Socialinsider's, which express saves as a share of followers: 0.05% for carousels, 0.04% for Reels and 0.02% for images across 21 million posts. Your own median matters more.

Can I see another account's saves or shares?

No. Saves and shares are private to the owner. You can see public likes and comments on posts, and some accounts hide even likes. Third-party tools that quote competitor saves are estimating.

What should I track every week?

For each post: format, hook pattern, reach, saves, shares, comments, likes. Then compute saves per reach, shares per reach and comments per like, and compare to your own median.

How long should I wait before judging a post?

We have no published curve, so we choose a fixed window and stick to it. Use the same one for every post, for example seven days, so results are comparable.

The Content Engine researches a niche, writes post ideas and renders carousels (PNG) and reels (MP4) on your own computer. USD 67 one time, 7-day refund. It needs a paid Claude plan (Pro or higher), Node.js and FFmpeg, and we have tested it on Windows only.

See the Content Engine

Sources and our data

Keep reading

Results vary. No promise of views, followers or income. The Content Engine is an independent product, not made or endorsed by Anthropic. Claude is named only as the tool it runs on.